Key Highlights
- But David Hamilton has taken the unprecedented step of instructing solicitors to begin legal proceedings which could see the government held in contempt of court. The Scottish government has been approached for comment. Government threatened with legal action over Sturgeon inquiry evidenceMinisters ordered to publish Sturgeon inquiry evidenceMinisters criticised over release of legal adviceThe Commissioner's office is dealing with six different freedom of information appeals relating to the Sturgeon and Salmond inquiries, and Swinney has said almost 90 requests have been received in total.
- The government is appealing against two key cases in the Court of Session, including an order to produce some of the evidence considered by independent advisor James Hamilton during his ministerial code probe.
- Swinney told MSPs that some of this material could identify complainers in the criminal court case against Salmond - which saw him cleared of sexual assault in 2020 - and this would breach court orders around anonymity for complainers.
- Ministers have agreed to produce the papers involved in the current case - involving correspondence with the secretariat working for James Hamilton - but said it was taking time to make necessary redactions.
- But Information Commissioner David Hamilton said full and timely compliance with requests was a vital part of the freedom of information system, leading to the unprecedented decision to take legal action. Scottish Information CommissionerDavid Hamilton was appointed Scottish Information Commissioner in 2023Benjamin Harrop, a member of the public who made the original freedom of information requests, said it was "really quite remarkable" that the matter had resulted in legal action. He said on social media: "Remember the SG (Scottish government) have had since 1st of December to release a new response to me.
